Memory of the matter, not the chat.
A co-pilot scoped to a matter, not a session. It remembers the sygnatura you cited on Tuesday, the deadline you set on Wednesday, and the clause your partner rewrote on Thursday — and uses all three when you open the file on Friday.
Three things the assistant holds for you.
i.Citation memory.
Every sygnatura cited within a matter is recorded with the paragraph it supported, the partner who endorsed it, and the date of verification. When the same legal point comes up six months later in the same sprawa, the assistant offers the same citation first — the firm does not re-verify what the firm already verified.
ii.Deadline arithmetic.
Termin zawity, termin instrukcyjny, dies a quo, dies ad quem — the assistant computes them per the controlling procedural rule and re-runs the math when a doręczenie shifts the start.[1]Calendar entries land on the partner's calendar with the controlling sygnatura on the entry.
iii.House style memory.
When a partner rewrites a clause the assistant suggested, the assistant remembers the rewrite — not as a general rule, but as a partner-specific preference. The next draft for that partner inherits the rewritten form. The next draft for a different partner does not.
One matter, four days, one memory.
A claim for unjustified contractual prowizja against a bank, watched across a working week.
Tuesday · 09:14
Associate runs research: “Is the bank's prowizja clause abusive under k.c. art. 385¹?” Three SN sygnatury returned, partner endorses III CSK 234/22 as the controlling citation.
Wednesday · 16:48
Doręczenie of bank's odpowiedź lands in Portal Informacyjny. Assistant computes the appellate window (k.p.c. art. 369) and books the slot.
Thursday · 11:02
Partner rewrites the assistant's draft clause on consumer foreseeability — preferring “obiektywna przewidywalność” over the suggested form. Style memory updates for L.K. only.
Friday · 08:30
Associate opens the matter to draft the apelacja. Assistant proposes the same III CSK 234/22, applies the deadline, and uses L.K.'s preferred phrasing in the foreseeability clause. No re-verification, no missed deadline.
FAQ.
What does the assistant remember — and what doesn't it?
Can two associates share a matter memory?
What if a partner changes their mind about a style preference?
Does the assistant alert the bar on missed deadlines?
Can the memory be exported when we leave?
- [1] k.p.c. art. 369 § 1 · 14-day apelacja window from doręczenie · isap.sejm.gov.pl
Adjacent surfaces.
Memory is scoped to the matter, not the user, not the session, and never across firms. Permissions follow your DMS.