§ I · Legal AI, European-deep

European legal AI that cites its work.

Verified case-law research, drafts in your firm's voice, and deadline math the bar trusts — built bottom-up from how mid-market European firms actually work. Polish-jurisprudence depth comes standard.

Pytanie · przedawnienie · k.c. art. 11814.03.2026

A claim from a B2C consumer contract becomes time-barred after six years, calculated from the end of the calendar year in which it fell due.[1]

III CSK 234/22 · Sąd Najwyższy · Izba Cywilna · 12.09.2023

The court is bound by the factual basis of the claim[2]and may not adjudicate on a different statutory basis without amendment. The end-of-year rule of art. 118 § 2 k.c. applies whether or not the obligee was a consumer at the date of the underlying act.

II CSK 89/24 · SN · Izba Cywilna · skład 3 · 04.02.2024
Citations verified · 2/2drafted 14:22 CET
Pytanie · klauzula abuzywna · k.c. art. 385114.03.2026

A unilateral right of the bank to modify prowizja during the term of a consumer credit contract is abusive when the consumer could not foresee the modification at signing.[1]

II CSK 412/22 · SN · Izba Cywilna · 21.06.2023

The applicable test is kontrola abstrakcyjna under art. 3851 § 1 k.c.[2] not the incidental control that lower courts have sometimes applied to this clause class. The 2024 SN ruling extends the test to fee-modification clauses generally.

III CZP 11/22 · SN · uchwała 7 sędziów · 04.10.2022
Citations verified · 2/2drafted 14:24 CET
Pytanie · doręczenie · k.p.c. art. 131114.03.2026

Doręczenie through Portal Informacyjny takes effect on the date the lawyer reads the document — or, if unread, on the fifteenth day after upload.[1]

k.p.c. art. 1311§ 2 · isap.sejm.gov.pl

The fiction of delivery applies only when the lawyer's Portal account is active and the document is correctly addressed.[2] If either condition fails the deadline runs from actual delivery; the bar treats silent miscalculation as a procedural error of the firm, not the system.

I NSNc 410/23 · SN · Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej · 18.01.2024
Citations verified · 2/2drafted 14:26 CET
Trusted by European law firms
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
§ II · How it actually works

Three steps. One matter. From question to filing.

i

Ask in your language. Read in citations.

Type the question the way you'd ask a senior partner, in any EU language. Get an answer anchored sentence-by-sentence to verified primary case-law — with the controlling paragraph quoted in line.

Read about research
ii

Draft in your firm's voice. Beside the document.

The Word add-in sits next to your draft and proposes citations and clauses in your firm's voice — with a margin mark every time the assistant makes a judgment call you should review.

Read about drafting
iii

File without leaving the matter.

Your jurisdiction's filing systems — Portal Informacyjny, KSeF and e-Doręczenia in PL, with Nordic and DACH systems on roadmap — all native. The assistant computes the deadline, books the slot, and writes the delivery timestamp back into the matter the moment it lands.

Read about integrations
§ IV · The platform in two minutes

A working demo, not a slide deck. See the four surfaces hold one matter end to end.

Duration
2 min 14 s
Language
Polski · EN subtitles
Sygnatura
III CSK 234/22
Recorded
02.2026 · Warsaw studio

For the first time we have a tool that reads sygnatury the way the court reads them. Everything else was a translation.

A managing partner · 20-lawyer kancelaria · Warsaw

The drafting voice is ours, not theirs. That's the difference between a tool we use and a tool we tolerate.

A litigation partner · regional kancelaria · Kraków

It refuses to answer when the corpus is silent. That single behaviour is why I trusted the citations.

A senior counsel · cross-border M&A · Stockholm

EU data residency

Frankfurt and Warsaw. No transfers outside the EEA.

GDPR compliant

DPA available. Art. 28 sub-processor list published.

Zero AI training

Your matters never enter any model's training set.

ISO 27001 · in progress

SOC 2 Type II audit underway. Certification roadmap on /security.

§ V · What we'll say on the record

Three claims about the platform. Each with a source attached.

I

Every answer is anchored in a primary source, surfaced in line with the sentence it supports.[1]

II

The corpus covers SN, NSA, TK, common-court rulings, and indexed EU case-law — not a translation layer.[2]

III

Customer data is processed under a zero-retention agreement, with EU-only hosting and audited sub-processors.[3]

Sources
  1. [1] Portal Orzeczeń Sądu Najwyższego · public corpus, updated daily · sn.pl/orzecznictwo
  2. [2] CURIA · Court of Justice of the European Union · curated EU case-law index · curia.europa.eu
  3. [3] Grasperly DPA v2.4 · published 02.2026 · grasperly.com/legal/dpa
§ VI · Built for the firms competing platforms can't reach

Three numbers we'll defend in writing.

A platform priced and shaped for the firms that magic-circle vendors cannot serve economically — without trading depth for European reach.

Firm size
580

Lawyers per firm, including solo practitioners on Practice tier. Magic-circle pricing models break below 60 lawyers; ours starts at five.

Today's customer base · 02.2026
Daily corpus updates
1 100+

New rulings indexed and verified every working day across Polish supreme, administrative, constitutional and common courts — the deepest Polish-jurisprudence corpus in any production legal AI. EU and Nordic coverage on roadmap.

Rolling 90-day average · 02.2026
Customer data in training
Zero

Not in our models, not in our sub-processors' models, not now, not ever. Tied to the DPA, audited per release.

DPA § 6.3 · in force since 01.2025

Spend an hour with us. We'll show you what citing back looks like.

Warsaw · Stockholm · serving European law firms